[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET Merge
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET Merge |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:29:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> I always followed the general rule that the generated ChangeLogs
>> should have the date when the change enters the Emacs repository
>
> Indeed, that is our rule.
That was the rule when ChangeLogs were hand-written, but since the
switch to generated ChangeLogs it does not (and cannot) apply.
Git does not record that date.
I suggest anyone working on a CEDET merge simply ignore such issues.
Ref: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-12/msg00102.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-12/msg00144.html
- Re: CEDET Merge, (continued)
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward Steere, 2017/01/18
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/18
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, Karl Fogel, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Glenn Morris, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Paul Eggert, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, Paul Eggert, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/24
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/26