[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: with-url
From: |
John Mastro |
Subject: |
Re: with-url |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:25:34 -0800 |
>>> Something else I take an issue with, is with `with-url' being a
>>> macro. :) That violates The First Rule of Macro Club.
>>
>> Yes, the first rule is "use a macro when it makes sense".
>
> Not really. And macros make sense the most when we add a control flow
> construct, or some sort of definition syntax for a new facility.
> Neither of which is really the case here.
I apologize if this has already been discussed, but how about
implementing this as a new function that improves on the current
situation but offers a traditional interface, plus a macro as an
optional convenience layer atop it?
John
- Re: with-url, (continued)
- Re: with-url, Yuri Khan, 2017/01/22
- Re: with-url, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/22
- Re: with-url, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/01/22
- Re: with-url, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: with-url, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/01/22
- Re: with-url, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/01/22
- Re: with-url, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/22
- Re: with-url, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/21
- Re: with-url, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/01/21
- Re: with-url, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/21
- Re: with-url,
John Mastro <=
Re: with-url, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/22