[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature

From: Tino Calancha
Subject: Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:55:12 +0900 (JST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Philipp Stephani wrote:

Jordon Biondo <address@hidden> schrieb am Mo., 30. Jan. 2017 um 19:39 Uhr:
Are maintainers and users still opposed to this change? If not I'd be happy to 
update the patch from the previous thread.

As a user, I'm still opposed to this change. I don't think consistency is important 
enough in this case to justify the "worse"
Why not to let people decide by themselves what is a better/worse
signature? Considering the opinions on this thread it's clear that better/worse are relative concepts here.
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]