[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support
|
From: |
Gdobbins |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:29:00 -0500 |
Attached is a new patch which implements length= and the <, >, <=, >= variants in lisp. They aren't as efficient as the length= from the previous patch, especially in cases like (length= list1 list2). Since these functions can't share a bytecode with their non-length counterparts I don't know whether the trade off of a compiler macro for them is worth it. With the lisp functions the resulting bytecode would be both larger, and if none of the sequences are lists, slower as well.
0001-Add-new-lisp-functions-length-and-related.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Gdobbins, 2017/03/05
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Elias Mårtenson, 2017/03/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, John Wiegley, 2017/03/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Richard Stallman, 2017/03/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Gdobbins, 2017/03/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/03/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Gdobbins, 2017/03/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support,
Gdobbins <=
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Ken Raeburn, 2017/03/10
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Gdobbins, 2017/03/10
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Gdobbins, 2017/03/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add new lisp function length= with bytecode support, Gdobbins, 2017/03/14