[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User-defined record types
From: |
Lars Brinkhoff |
Subject: |
Re: User-defined record types |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:34:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> We could auto-detect the use of old-style structs (and set the
> compatibility var) when cl-struct-define is called with a nil value of
> the `type` argument.
Great, I'll add that.
> Of course, this means we need to use a different value for the new
> `record` format.
The symbol `record' springs to mind.
> One more thing: what's up with "record2"? Which branch should I pay
> attention to? If you don't intend to keep using scratch/record, then
> it's better to just replace scratch/record with scratch/record2: you
> can rebase/rewrite those `scratch` branches at will.
I'm happy to do that. I was not sure what the policy is with replaced
branched. But if that is ok, I'll mercilessly rewrite it until it's
readly for merging. I have deleted record2 and updated scratch/record.
- Re: User-defined record types, (continued)
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/15
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/15
- Re: User-defined record types, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/16
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/16
- Re: User-defined record types, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/17
- Re: User-defined record types, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/17
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/18
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/18
- Re: User-defined record types,
Lars Brinkhoff <=
- Re: User-defined record types, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/19