[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binding S-mouse-1
From: |
Tak Kunihiro |
Subject: |
Re: binding S-mouse-1 |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2017 17:20:28 +0900 (JST) |
>> I think internal consistency between mouse-1 and S-mouse-1 also
>> matters as well as behavior of S-mouse-1 across applications.
>
> The current binding of S-mouse-1 was not taken out of thin air, it was
> modeled on other applications as well, AFAIR.
I suppose that you also infer consistency across applications. If so,
targeting applications matter, I think.
>>> All that just to provide some kind of "consistency"? I'm not sure
>>> it's a good enough reason for changing such a veteran behavior.
>> Shift should modify operation by mouse-1. I think `extend region' can
>> be regarded as modified set-point; however mouse-appearance-menu has
>> significant distance from set-point.
> But I don't think we should change the default behavior of S-mouse-1.
How do you think about reason that I inferred, consistency within
Emacs?