Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit (was: comparing code on different branches)

[Filipe Silva]

​I support this, could not agree more. 

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:29 PM, John Yates <address@hidden> wrote:

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:

I wish someone would write a package comparable to Magit that
we could get legal papers for and include it in Emacs.

​Richard,

I cannot let this go without commenting.  Do you understand what

you are advocating?

In Jonas you have someone who is doing just about everything

right per your notion of software freedom including applying gpl v3.

He has made significant personal sacrifices to provide emacs with

a package that is unique among editors and IDEs.  It could emerge

as one of those oh-so-elusive creatures: a true killer app for the

emacs platform.

Jonas has and continues to deliver a steady stream of features,

bug fixes and refinements.  Magit is clearly a work of love that is

wonderfully supported.  Jonas has exhibited admirable project

leadership skill and has published a detailed, credible map to

the future:

  https://github.com/magit/magit/projects/1

Some of us care enough about developers like Jonas and the

value he is delivering to emacs that we have responded to his

plea for financial support via PayPal, Patreon or Bountysource.

Were Jonas' effort invested in a non-GNU project, or at least not

one so dear to you heart as emacs, I suspect that you would

applaud his work.

Instead you seem to advocate undercutting Jonas' efforts with

no good reason to believe that you would get a replacement of

anywhere near the same quality.  Further, were you actually to

mount such a competing effort I am confident that long before it

ever delivered any useful amount of functionality you, the emacs

community, and the gnu effort would harvest significant bad press.

Sometimes community might be more important than copyright

assignment.  Please reconsider you request.

/john