[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Native line numbers landed on master
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Native line numbers landed on master |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:33:54 +0300 |
> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:12:51 +0200
>
> > Btw, if I were to do this, what other face attributes would you expect
> > to see removed from the empty fields, in addition to background color?
> > Or do you simply want them to be displayed using the line-number face
> > instead? (That could be a different font size.)
>
> I'd expect it to use the line-number face. I confidently predict
> opinions will differ here :-)
Well, using line-number is definitely easier to implement than what I
originally thought you wanted. But let's see those opinions first ;-)
> BTW, since we're discussing options, I definitely don't want a
> configuration variable, let's just decide one way or the other.
Agreed.
- Sharp-quoting function symbols (Was: Native line numbers landed on master), (continued)
Re: Native line numbers landed on master, Kaushal Modi, 2017/07/11
Re: Native line numbers landed on master, Yuri D'Elia, 2017/07/15