|Subject:||Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build|
|Date:||Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:39:01 +0200|
> Cc: fabrice.popineau@
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 23:40:05 -0700
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Not sure what to do about this. Add 'volatile' to the declaration of
> > 'c'?
> Looks like a GCC bug. To work around it, please try CACHEABLE instead of
> volatile, to warn the reader that it's a compiler-bug workaround. Like this:
> struct handler *CACHEABLE c = handlerlist->nextfree;
Richard, Fabrice -- could you try this, please?
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|