[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:02:22 +0300 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:36:43 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Thanks for the review; pushed to master as cb99cf5a99.
Boom! We've just started talking about this, and AFAIU didn't even
agree on this library. And I'm not sure we want a JSON library as an
optional feature. So I must ask you to please revert, and let's wait
until the discussion comes to its completion.
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, (continued)
- Speed of Elisp (was: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance), Stefan Monnier, 2017/09/17
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Richard Stallman, 2017/09/19
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Glenn Morris, 2017/09/18