|Subject:||Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++|
|Date:||Sat, 14 Oct 2017 12:22:13 +0100|
> From: Reuben Thomas <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 09:29:52 +0100
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden>,
> Noam Postavsky <address@hidden
net>, Sami Kerola <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> João Távora <address@hidden>,
> Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>, Leo Liu <address@hidden>,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> "...I'd rather let Flycheck die if no maintainer was left to work on it than moving it into Emacs..."
> It doesn't have to be moved, just as Org was not moved into Emacs, but continues to be maintained
> externally, and its sources imported.
You mean, import Flycheck over its developer's objections?
It's the developer's legitimate right not to allow it.
And even if we did, how will this work once
bug reports will come in, and we will expect/request the Flycheck
developers to handle them?
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|