emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A generalization of `thunk-let' (was: `thunk-let'?)


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: A generalization of `thunk-let' (was: `thunk-let'?)
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:59:47 -0500

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > Say, you write a user interface, and it includes some toggle commands.
  > When one of these toggle commands is called, the code will probably need
  > to recompute some variables to adopt their bindings to the new set of
  > options.

Why design this to work on let bindings
rather than on top-level buffer-local bindings?
Wouldn't the latter be most convenient for this sort of thing?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]