|
From: | Philipp Stephani |
Subject: | Re: Should mode commands be idempotent? |
Date: | Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:49:49 +0000 |
> address@hidden
> +Calling the major mode command twice in direct succession should not
> +fail and should do the same thing as calling the command only once.
I think I'd prefer it if the word "idempotent" was mentioned (not
*instead* of what you have, but additionally).
Other than that: LGTM.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |