[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 04:49:09 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I am tempted to argue that silently returning the wrong answer is a more
> serious (but admittedly less visible) issue
That's a bug and we should fix it, but I don't expect
it to require big changes.
Adding any sort of bignums is a big change.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion, (continued)
- Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2018/02/18
- Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion, Richard Stallman, 2018/02/19
- Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2018/02/22
- Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/02/22
- Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion, Stefan Monnier, 2018/02/22
- Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion, John Wiegley, 2018/02/19