Re: A combination of defmacro, functionp, and quoted lambdas yields different results on consecutive evaluations

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I was about to suggest that you might ask the Flycheck maintainer to
>> provide a function that can be used instead of the macro
>> flycheck-define-checker, but I see that it's pretty much already the
>> case: just use flycheck-define-command-checker.
> Oh, the Flycheck maintainers is already well aware of the issue: there are
> two of them, and one of them is me :)
> That function is semi-internal: we don't want people to have to use it.

Then I guess my suggestion is to make it non-internal.

>> it also works if you don't byte-compile, except that the
>> with-eval-after-load becomes ineffective.
> What do you mean by ineffective? It would just run immediately because the
> form above loads Flycheck when interpreted, right?

Yes.


        Stefan