Re: What improvements would be truly useful?

[Marcin Borkowski]

On 2018-03-08, at 05:45, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:

>> I am really looking forward to this.  LibreOffice is free software,
>> and it's ethical, but it isn't Emacs.
>
> IMO the essence of WYSIWYG makes it "not Emacs".  I'd like to be able to
> usefully edit .odt documents with Emacs, but not in a WYSIWYG fashion.

Interesting.  I have a very similar sentiment, though I think it is
quite irrational.

Is mu4e, Org-mode, Calc, or dunnet also "not Emacs"?  If not, how is it
different than a word processor?

I'm not mocking you, I just want to understand the sentiment we both
share.

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl