[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Split `simple.el'?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Split `simple.el'? |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:33:54 +0300 |
> From: Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:37:25 -0400
>
> That buffer is very strange. Selecting parts of it causes the fonts to
> change in all sorts of surprising ways.
Anything like that is generally a bug: it means we don't supply enough
of the buffer to the shaping engine for it to return the correct
glyphs, which means some problem in the composition rules and/or in
the shaping engine itself (which in your case is libotf/libm17n-flt).
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, (continued)
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/07
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/08
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/08
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/08
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/09
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/09
Re: Split `simple.el'?, John Wiegley, 2018/04/04
Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/05
Re: Split `simple.el'?, John Wiegley, 2018/04/05
Re: Split `simple.el'?, Jefferson Carpenter, 2018/04/04
RE: Split `simple.el'?, Drew Adams, 2018/04/04
Re: Split `simple.el'?, Achim Gratz, 2018/04/05