[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2018 18:09:09 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 23:05:24 -0400
>
> > I don't think HTML rendering per se is the problem. The problem is
> > when the MUA automatically fetches stuff referenced in the email as a
> > URL pointing to some server.
>
> Indeed, that's what does it -- but this is a part of HTML rendering,
> isn't it?
Not a necessary part, no. E.g., Rmail invokes shr.el to render an
HTML body while disabling image loading, and since shr.el doesn't
support CSS, it doesn't fetch CSS, either.
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/19
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/19
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/19
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/20
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/21
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/20
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/21
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Joost Kremers, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/17