[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?
|
From: |
George Plymale II |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 May 2018 11:38:16 -0400 |
Nick Helm <address@hidden> writes:
> IMO, these aren't good solutions though, as they just mask NS's bad
> behaviour.
Sure, it would be ideal to actually fix the issue. I'm all for
that. However, I don't think we should completely discount the usage of
osx-pseudo-daemon in case we can't fix the issue for whatever reason.
- George Plymale II
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, (continued)
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/15
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/17
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?,
George Plymale II <=
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/29