[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: regex.c simplification

From: Perry E. Metzger
Subject: Re: regex.c simplification
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 15:27:28 -0400

On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:06:43 +0200 Andreas Schwab
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The problem is that none of the other regex implementations support
> a gap.

Not quite. A couple of them (say TRE) support having a mechanism to
fetch the next character rather than assuming they're present in a
flat array or what have you, which would allow for dealing with a gap

Perry E. Metzger                address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]