[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bignum branch

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: bignum branch
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:53:17 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 07/16/2018 07:42 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:02:34 -0700

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Not sure what you mean by "our GMP substitute source code".  Do you
mean mini-gmp?  I didn't yet look at it, and so I don't know what that
means in practice.  (Someone said it's less efficient than GMP?)
Yes, I meant mini-gmp.
The functions in mini-gmp have the same problem, so I'm unsure why
this solution is better.

The idea is to fix mini-gmp ourselves so that they do not have the same problem. This should be easy, and it should be more efficient than the patch that you mentioned.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]