emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bignum branch

From: Clément Pit-Claudel
Subject: Re: bignum branch
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:43:52 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 
On 2018-07-18 09:18, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> For example, (eql 0.0e+NaN -0.0e+NaN) now returns t
>>> because the two NaNs have different signs; formerly it returned nil.
>> Should this be the other way around ?
> You mean it's (eql -0.0e+NaN 0.0e+NaN) which should return t?
> Shouldn't `eql` be commutative?

No, I mean that Paul wrote 't' where he meant 'nil' and 'nil' where he meant 
't'.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]