[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp

From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 06:39:22 +0200 (CEST)

> My sense is that the proposed C-x & is a prefix, because it is used before
> another key sequence.  It is not an argument because it doesn't affect the
> functions' argument list the way C-u does.
> Maybe the term should be "prefix sequence"?

What about `multiplexer command', avoiding the perhaps misleading `prefix'
word altogether?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]