[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Aug 2018 19:15:20 +0300 |
> From: Tom Tromey <address@hidden>
> Cc: Tom Tromey <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:50:14 -0600
>
> I don't think further work on the libjit branch is a waste of time.
> On the whole I tend to think that libjit, due to having few
> dependencies and a slimmer runtime model, is the better JIT solution.
Thanks, that's good to know, as after spending a day and a half on
debugging, I finally know the root cause for the crashes.
- 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/16
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/16
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/19
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/19
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/19
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Ken Brown, 2018/08/27
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/28
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Ken Brown, 2018/08/28
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/28
- Re: 32-bit MinGW build with JIT, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/19