[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?

From: Tom Tromey
Subject: Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:28:50 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> ">" == Live System User <address@hidden> writes:

>>         Admittedly a minor nit, but why use the name `thread-alive-p'
>>         instead of `thread-live-p' in the
>>         scratch/list-thread branch?

Just thoughtlessness on my part, back when.

>>         This would make it similiar to `process-live-p',
>>         `buffer-live-p', `window-live-p' etc for threead
>>         objects.

There are a few *-alive-p functions as well.  I think if I had thought
of it I would have chosen thread-live-p though.

I tend to doubt it is worth switching, but I wouldn't oppose it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]