Re: open-{gnutls,network}-stream backwards compatibility

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:12:22 +0000
> 
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:47:55 +0100 Robert Pluim <address@hidden> wrote: 
> 
> RP> So nil/t would mean :nowait nil/t, and anything else would be a
> RP> plist. Itʼs not perfect, but I guess backwards compatibility is
> RP> important.
> 
> I like that approach as well, noting also that the `open-gnutls-stream' docs 
> say
> 
>   This is a very simple wrapper around `gnutls-negotiate'
> 
> which in turn takes a plist. So maybe the callers should just call
> `gnutls-negotiate', and `open-gnutls-stream' should be deprecated
> because it has failed to be a simple wrapper :)

If we can make the change backward-compatible, there's no reason to
deprecate it.