[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jan 2019 23:19:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>>> Basically, the post explains most of my problem:
>>> http://mbork.pl/2016-04-12_Showing_some_of_those_Async_Shell_Command_buffers
>>> and an (extremely hackish) solution. Since the prefix argument to
>>> `async-shell-command' is pretty useless, I would like it to make the
>>> output window disappear (or appear, whichever is the saner default,
>>> possibly decided by some variable).
>>>
>>> Does such an idea make sense? Should I file a feature request?
>>
>> Is something wrong with customizing async-shell-command-display-buffer?
>> I have it set to nil for quite some time.
>
> Would it help for this use-case? That is, make the output buffers
> disappear (even in the presence of some output), but not if a prefix
> argument is used?
Does C-u already mean inserting the output in the current buffer?
Maybe then you could use e.g. M-0 prefix arg?
- async-shell-command and prefix argument, Marcin Borkowski, 2019/01/14
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/01/15
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Marcin Borkowski, 2019/01/16
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/01/19
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Marcin Borkowski, 2019/01/20
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/01/20
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Marcin Borkowski, 2019/01/20
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/01/21
- Re: async-shell-command and prefix argument, Marcin Borkowski, 2019/01/24