[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cursors: Is superimposing the same glyph a feature?
From: |
Keith David Bershatsky |
Subject: |
Re: Cursors: Is superimposing the same glyph a feature? |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:28:49 -0800 |
Thank you both.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
> Date: [02-16-2019 03:00:21] <16 Feb 2019 11:00:21 +0000>
> From: Alan Third <address@hidden>
> To: Keith David Bershatsky <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Cursors: Is superimposing the same glyph a feature?
>
> * * *
>
> I can see it too. I'd never noticed. I doubt very much it's
> intentional.
>
> It looks like the NS port does the wrong thing here. At the moment it
> redraws the glyph on top of the cursor as long as CURSOR_TYPE !=
> NO_CURSOR, but looking at an X build, it looks as though HBAR_CURSOR,
> for example, should cover the glyph.
>
> So I reckon we should only redraw the glyph if the cursor is filled box or
> hollow box.
>
> Patch attached.
> --
> Alan Third
>
> [* 0001-Prevent-redrawing-the-glyph-on-top-of-bar-cursors.patch]