[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cl-defun vs defun (was: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib mac
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: cl-defun vs defun (was: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?) |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2019 22:41:49 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> As described under "(cl) Argument Lists", cl-defun extends defun to
> support CL argument lists (with default values for optional arguments,
> keyword arguments, etc.)
Long ago, adding these features to Emacs would have been bloat and would
have caused problems for users. But not nowadays. So I see no reason
to oppose it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/03/15
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/15
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Andreas Schwab, 2019/03/17
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/03/17