[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Oddities with dynamic modules

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Oddities with dynamic modules
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:17:34 +0200

> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:04:07 +0100
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
> > > I thought simplicity and convenience of use tramps simplicity of the
> > > implementation, so it is strange to read arguments to the contrary.
> > > IME, inconvenient interfaces are the main reason for them being
> > > unstable, but that's me.
> >
> > A good middle ground is a minimalistic (but sufficient) API at the
> > host side, plus idiomatic convenience wrapper libraries for each
> > client language. (The latter need not be maintained by the host API
> > maintainer.)
> Yes, that's exactly what Daniel suggested in his initial design. It's
> also what largely seems to be happening: people have written idiomatic
> wrappers for Rust, Go, and probably other languages.

Where's the wrapper for C?

> Thus I'd say this is working as inteded.

I still find it strange (and can already hardly remember what I wrote
several months ago, so perhaps try to respond sooner next time?).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]