On 2019-03-21, at 18:54, Philippe Vaucher
<address@hidden> wrote:
As I said earlier, it's possible that adding the gitlab workflow
would
yield 0 additional contributors, the only way to know for sure
would be to
try it. Personnally I believe that at least for "typo fixes" and
tiny
changes you'd get more contributions, because proposing a change on
the
gitlab model is trivial (browse to the correct file, click "edit",
edit the
file in your browser, press "propose changes", done).
Anway, what I am sure of is that if the gitlab workflow was added
there
would be contributors on this ML (including me) that would use it
instead
of the mailing list workflow.
Hi,
I loosely follow this discussion, but I'm curious: isn't a git branch
workflow equally well supported? I did contribute a bit to Emacs, and
what i did was push a feature branch and ask for it to be reviewed and
merged. Not quite what Gitlab does, but closer than sending patches
by
email.