[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab

From: Konstantin Kharlamov
Subject: Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:24:56 +0300

On Пт, Mar 22, 2019 at 13:37:23, Marcin Borkowski <address@hidden> wrote:

On 2019-03-21, at 18:54, Philippe Vaucher <address@hidden> wrote:

As I said earlier, it's possible that adding the gitlab workflow would yield 0 additional contributors, the only way to know for sure would be to try it. Personnally I believe that at least for "typo fixes" and tiny changes you'd get more contributions, because proposing a change on the gitlab model is trivial (browse to the correct file, click "edit", edit the
 file in your browser, press "propose changes", done).

Anway, what I am sure of is that if the gitlab workflow was added there would be contributors on this ML (including me) that would use it instead
 of the mailing list workflow.


I loosely follow this discussion, but I'm curious: isn't a git branch
workflow equally well supported?  I did contribute a bit to Emacs, and
what i did was push a feature branch and ask for it to be reviewed and
merged. Not quite what Gitlab does, but closer than sending patches by

This might work. I'd be afraid of sending patches on my own that way because I don't know an attitude here to "making developers to access stuff on unknown sites". But if that's supported, I'd definitely use it.

Is this indeed supported? If yes, can we modify the https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Sending-Patches.html to include such workflow?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]