>They are the same thing -- they are not "two types of software".
>Rather, there are two terms for the same type of software, and those
>terms each have different emphases.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html . [Quote]If a license includes unconscionable restrictions, we reject it, even if we did not anticipate the issue in these criteria.[Quote] You can find that Richard Stallman gives you more freedoms than Sybase.
[Prev in Thread]
[Next in Thread]
Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source",