Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source"

[microsoft gaofei]

>They are the same thing -- they are not "two types of software".
>Rather, there are two terms for the same type of software, and those
>terms each have different emphases. 
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html  . [Quote]If a license includes unconscionable restrictions, we reject it, even if we did not anticipate the issue in these criteria.[Quote] You can find that Richard Stallman gives you more freedoms than Sybase.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybase_Open_Watcom_Public_License