[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Adding problems to an existing bug report, was: Re: bug#23179: 25.0.92;
Adding problems to an existing bug report, was: Re: bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:35:11 +0300
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
On 29.04.2019 22:32, Juri Linkov wrote:
Actually I don't dislike Debbugs, I just hesitated to create a new report
for such a small problem. Even if we used another bug tracker like GitLab,
I would try to add this as a comment to an existing issue instead of
creating a separate one.
If it fits, sure. Especially if the solutions might be related.
In this case I hesitated to put a bug number into a commit message where
the bug title is entirely different.
So the problem is not in Debbugs, and GitLab
is not a panacea. Moreover, when working on a project in GitLab, I strive
to do as much work as possible in Emacs, e.g. read MR diffs using vc-git,
but still miss an ability to follow GitLab discussions in Emacs.
Until someone writes Emacs frontend to GitLab discussion lists,
I prefer the current Gnus frontend to Debbugs discussion threads.
Well, I don't use Gnus too much these days, but I know a lot of people do.
Speaking of GitLab clients, here's one:
I haven't tried it myself yet, but it seems to include commenting
- Adding problems to an existing bug report, was: Re: bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search,
Dmitry Gutov <=