[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnus-bug
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: gnus-bug |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:07:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
> Not sure whether that was asked before. Gnus is now part of GNU emacs,
> should I still use
>
> 1. gnus-bug
> 2. Or report-emacs-bug?
The end result is always the same, a report in debbugs. What's a bit
different is the default text inserted into the message.
> BTW, if gnus-bug should not be used, I suggest to remove it.
> In case I can use it I think the naming should be unified. So
> report-gnus-bug instead of gnus-bug.
I guess the name is that way because it's the original name, and because
usually all functions of a package start with the package name.
Bye,
Tassilo
- gnus-bug, Uwe Brauer, 2019/04/30
- Re: gnus-bug,
Tassilo Horn <=