[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Towards a cleaner build

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen
Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:19:08 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> > Would it make sense instead to move it to a separate file and put that
>> > file in lisp/obsolete?
>> I can do that if you think that's the right solution.  But it's been
>> obsolete since 2013, so isn't it time for it to go?
> Moving it into obsolete is a way of making it "go", no?

But we do eventually remove obsolete stuff from lisp/obsolete too,
right?  :-)

I'm just wondering whether there's a policy on these things so that I
don't have to bother you with these details -- a period of time, or a
number of releases, or something, that determines when code marked as
obsolete should be deleted from the Emacs source tree.

(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]