[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a cleaner build
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a cleaner build |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jun 2019 12:15:47 -0400 |
On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 11:40, Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> (with-suppressed-warnings ((lexical prefixless))
> (defvar prefixless))
It's a bit funny that the warning is named 'lexical', when it's about
a non-lexical variable.
> (with-suppressed-warnings ((obsolete obsolete))
> (obsolete))
> (with-suppressed-warnings ((obsolete obsolete-variable))
> obsolete-variable)
We might want to support suppressing the warning for obsolete
functions and variables separately?
> (with-suppressed-warnings ((mapcar mapcar))
> (mapcar #'list '(1 2 3)))
This is the 'mapcar called for effect' one, right? Could we group it
with 'value returned from (+ 1 2) is unused' for (progn (+ 1 2) nil)?
Even though the byte compiler implementation might have them seperate,
I think they're pretty much the same thing from the point of view of
an elisp author.
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Andreas Schwab, 2019/06/09
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/09
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/09
- Re: Towards a cleaner build,
Noam Postavsky <=
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/09
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/09
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/09
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/09