Re: Towards a cleaner build

[Noam Postavsky]

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 12:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:

> I agree with all these, but I thought it might be nice to have the same
> symbols as in byte-compile-warnings (and byte-compile-warning-types),

Oh, I missed that, yeah, that make sense.

> But...  perhaps we could tweak `byte-compile-warnings' featurewise, too?

But maybe do that in a separate step (i.e., after
with-suppressed-warnings lands on master).