Re: Towards a cleaner build: eieio

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> What's the path forward here?
>
> It's been obsolete since 26.1, so I think we should just wait.

Sorry, I meant -- are all these object-print methods supposed to be
expressed as cl-print-object methods instead?  And if so, can they be
rewritten that way now without breaking anything?  Or would that break
out-of-tree code that calls object-print?

eieio.el has general fallback code for object-print, but does not
consult the output of cl-print-object for the objects, so I guess that
might break something?  But...  could we do that, without going all
recursive?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no