[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose? |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jun 2019 16:53:09 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 15:29:39 +0200
>
> diff --git a/src/Makefile.in b/src/Makefile.in
> index be769458d3..b89a2f890e 100644
> --- a/src/Makefile.in
> +++ b/src/Makefile.in
> @@ -776,7 +776,12 @@ .PHONY:
> ## bootstrap-emacs$(EXEEXT) as an order-only prerequisite.
>
> %.elc: %.el | bootstrap-emacs$(EXEEXT) $(bootstrap_pdmp)
> +ifeq (@AM_V@,)
> + @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory\
> + -C ../lisp EMACS="$(bootstrap_exe)" THEFILE=$< $<c
> +else
> @$(MAKE) -C ../lisp EMACS="$(bootstrap_exe)" THEFILE=$< $<c
> +endif
I think this should depend on V being equal or unequal to 0. Because
one should be able to say "make V=0" and still have these messages
suppressed.
> $ V=1 make bootstrap
>
> now gives me:
>
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp'
> EMACSLOADPATH= '../src/bootstrap-emacs' -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp
> --eval '(setq load-prefer-newer t)' \
> -l bytecomp -f byte-compile-refresh-preloaded \
> -f batch-byte-compile ../lisp/dos-w32.el
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp'
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp'
> EMACSLOADPATH= '../src/bootstrap-emacs' -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp
> --eval '(setq load-prefer-newer t)' \
> -l bytecomp -f byte-compile-refresh-preloaded \
> -f batch-byte-compile ../lisp/dynamic-setting.el
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp'
>
> which is what it's supposed to be, I think?
Yes, but what happens if you say "V=0 make bootstrap"?
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, (continued)
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Andreas Schwab, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Alan Mackenzie, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Andreas Schwab, 2019/06/15
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/16
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Paul Eggert, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, David Ringo, 2019/06/14
- Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/15
Re: Make the compilation slightly less verbose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/14