Re: Towards a cleaner build: other output

[Clément Pit-Claudel]

On 2019-06-17 19:08, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> Those "not registering" mean that the corresponding definitions will not
>>> be findable via things like `C-h o` until the package is loaded.  As for
>>> what the developer should do: cleanup his namespace!
>>
>> :-)
> 
> Oh, there's no happy face about those messes, no!

Wait wait, some of these messages seemed wrong, too:

> Not registering prefix "is" from ind-util.  Affects: 
> ("is13194-default-repertory" "is13194-repertory-to-ucs-script" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-devanagari-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-devanagari-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-bengali-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-bengali-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-assamese-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-assamese-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-gurmukhi-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-gurmukhi-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-gujarati-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-gujarati-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-oriya-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-oriya-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-tamil-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-tamil-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-telugu-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-telugu-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-malayalam-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-malayalam-regexp" 
> "is13194-to-ucs-kannada-hashtbl" "is13194-to-ucs-kannada-regexp" 
> "iscii-to-ucs-region")

Shouldn't the prefix be `is13194', instead of `is' (at least except for that 
last entry)?