[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:33:02 +0200 |
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:57 AM Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> If this is the change, then yes, emacs-26 should be fine for it. But
> let's first wait for a while, to let others object, and then decide.
No other opinions for almost a week.
- Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/10
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/11
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Paul Eggert, 2019/06/11
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/12
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/13
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/21
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/21
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/21