[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:52:58 +0300 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:33:02 +0200
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:57 AM Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >
> > If this is the change, then yes, emacs-26 should be fine for it. But
> > let's first wait for a while, to let others object, and then decide.
>
> No other opinions for almost a week.
So what are your suggestions?
- Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/10
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/11
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Paul Eggert, 2019/06/11
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/12
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/13
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/19
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/06/21
- Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/21