[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?)
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?) |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 15:37:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Sorry, that was the first commit in the repository. The one above
> corresponds to this one:
> revision 1.1
> date: 1985-12-14 16:58:10 +0000; author: jimb; state: Exp;
> Initial revision
I see, the strange thing is that it seem the first file checkin was
unused.el.
I would have expected emacs.c or something like this.
The question is how reliable is the conversion? It seem to work
reasonable well for the part which concerns bzr, but I am not so sure
about the RCS stuff.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), Stefan Monnier, 2019/08/17
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), John Wiegley, 2019/08/17