Re: Subsecond decoded-time again

[Paul Eggert]

On 9/29/19 6:01 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> I thought I remembered that we settled on giving a special parameter to
> `decode-time' to make it return the sub-second bits, too?

Yes, it's the optional new FORM parameter of decode-time. E.g,, 
(decode-time '(1566009571321 . 1000) t t) yields ((31321 . 1000) 39 2 17 
8 2019 6 nil 0). This example is taken from the manual.