|Subject:||RE: Request for partecipating in the project|
|Date:||Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:04:10 +0000|
> epub is an HTML based format. Essentially it is an archive file of HTML and metadata.
XML, not html.
> So the issue isn't so much whether it is
> better than HTML but more about some of
> the tools available.
Might be that there are better applications for voice reading then Emacs, albeit I think that your target group is already reading Emacs manual in Emacspeak. I think I will try to set up Emacspeak for myself, have not done it yet.
Anyway, I hinted that epub might not be THE best format for a reference like API docs. I don't think that structure of chapters and especially pages are very good structure for electronic documents, especially not for API docs or references. Do you miss "page structure" on Wikipedia?
Emacs self documentation is good and being able to lookup stuff directly from within your Emacs is priceless, but sometimes I miss an easy overview of the api, for example when I can't remember name of a function or similar.
Skickat från min Samsung Galaxy-smartphone
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 17:34, Mario Lang <address@hidden> wrote:
Tim Cross <address@hidden> writes:
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|