Re:Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell?

[tumashu]

At 2020-01-23 01:33:25, "martin rudalics" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Mark set
> > Elapsed time: 0.235007s (0.050980s in 2 GCs)
> > "Elapsed time: 0.235007s (0.050980s in 2 GCs)"
> > Elapsed time: 0.209364s (0.025391s in 1 GCs)
> > "Elapsed time: 0.209364s (0.025391s in 1 GCs)"
> > Mark activated
> > Elapsed time: 0.250710s (0.052309s in 2 GCs)
> > "Elapsed time: 0.250710s (0.052309s in 2 GCs)"
> > Elapsed time: 0.241979s (0.051069s in 2 GCs)
> > "Elapsed time: 0.241979s (0.051069s in 2 GCs)"
> > Mark set
>
>Sorry, what are these numbers?  Do they represent GTK builds with the
>same options as the Lucid build that takes 0.684959s?  Did you test all
>with emacs -Q in the same buffer and at the same position?
>

Sorry, finally I find it is set-frame-position's reason, it too slow,  not 
posn-at-point

When I test, I replace posn-at-point to a fix value, and  posframe has cached 
this value,
not call set-frame-positon, so speed is fast,






>martin