[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:53:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 |
On 2020-02-25 04:33, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Feb 23 2020, Drew Adams wrote:
>
>> 1. Warning during regexp input (e.g. regexp Isearch)
>> would likely, itself, be quite confusing or
>> annoying.
>
> It's not unlike the error you get during input of an incomplete or
> otherwise malformed regexp.
Yes, handling it that way would work quite fine, I think.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/23
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Richard Stallman, 2020/02/24
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/25
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/25
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/26