Re: :alnum: broken?

[Mattias Engdegård]

28 feb. 2020 kl. 21.38 skrev Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:

> A couple of solutions was proposed that could be regarded as
> compromises, and allow us to flag these suspicious regexps in at least
> some of the use cases.  I'm okay with those proposals, but not with
> the radical one you described.

What about adding a variable controlling the change, defaulting to the stricter 
semantics? Users who depend on the looser interpretation, or find that the 
change would cramp their style, will happily set that variable permanently and 
suffer no ill effects. Everyone get what they want!