[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-27 60c84ad: ; * etc/TODO: Fix last change.

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: emacs-27 60c84ad: ; * etc/TODO: Fix last change.
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 19:19:13 +0200

> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 17:54:17 +0100
>     >> Your concern here is what Emacs should do when one of the characters 
> in this
>     >> range is followed by U+FE0E or U+FE0F?
>     Eli> The latter.  The former doesn't affect the visual appearance of those
>     Eli> base characters, so it's basically a no-op.
> If we put the specific codepoints in the 2XXX and 3XXX blocks that
> have 'Emoji' property in the emoji script, they'll display by default
> with a nice font, and will be composed if they're followed by
> FE0F. Would that be such a bad thing?

I think it would be jarring to see, say, U+2640 ♀ or U+266B ♫ as emoji
in the middle of otherwise "normal" text.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]