Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler

[Eli Zaretskii]

On March 22, 2020 11:23:23 AM GMT+02:00, "Mattias Engdegård" <address@hidden> 
wrote:
> 22 mars 2020 kl. 04.28 skrev Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
> 
> > I meant to document the command.  Please do document it.  Making
> > important functions internal solves no problem.
> 
> The rest of the patch has been retracted. There is nothing to
> document.

That's too bad, but if this is the case, I see no reason to have a primitive 
that is not used by any command or public API.  We don't have any other 
primitives like that, AFAIR, we only add primitives that have some uses.